|
From: | schugk |
Subject: | Re: [Chicken-users] coops |
Date: | Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:55:27 +0100 |
User-agent: | Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.6) |
This reflects the way scheme sees lists, which are build of pairs:
Jeha, i know. A list is a pair, but a pair is not a list. Therefore a list should be a subclass of pair. (Ok, for '() we have <null>).
And the other point is, that i can not specialized generic procedures for <pair> and <list>. Maybe it is intended (?).
Thanks Sandro
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |