[Chicken-users] Re: redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP

chicken-users

From:	David Steiner
Subject:	[Chicken-users] Re: redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP
Date:	Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:44:50 +0100

i found a workaround by not redefining the built in procedures and
giving them different names.

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[Chicken-users] redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP, David Steiner, 2010/12/03
- [Chicken-users] Re: redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP, David Steiner <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP, Kon Lovett, 2010/12/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP, Hans Nowak, 2010/12/03
  - Re: [Chicken-users] redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP, F. Wittenberger, 2010/12/03
    - Re: [Chicken-users] redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP, Alan Post, 2010/12/03
    - Re: [Chicken-users] redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP, F. Wittenberger, 2010/12/04
    - Re: [Chicken-users] redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP, Felix, 2010/12/04
    - Re: [Chicken-users] redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP, F. Wittenberger, 2010/12/04
  - Re: [Chicken-users] redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP, Jim Ursetto, 2010/12/03
    - Re: [Chicken-users] redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP, Leonardo Valeri Manera, 2010/12/03
    - Re: [Chicken-users] redefining cons,car,cdr in SICP, Elf, 2010/12/04