Re: [Chicken-users] Using irregex safely & responsibly

[Peter Bex]

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 09:51:15AM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> > > #;9> (irregex-match-valid-index? m 3)
> > > 0
> > 
> > It returns #t for this in the upstream irregex.
> 
> I'll look into that. It's probably a bug introduced by a
> Chicken-specific optimization.

Yeah, it was a small oversight in a manual merge of a failed patch hunk
for irregex upstream changeset 9c903144d459.
It has been fixed in experimental 0ea0570b4555c737e35288ba9f43e45b25539913.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth