chicken-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it


From: Felix
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:30:43 +0200 (CEST)

From: Arthur Maciel <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg - understanding it
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:30:59 -0300

> Hum... to understand it a little more: why protobj instead of TinyCLOS or
> coops?

It's simple and leightweight. And coops didn't exist when the qt egg
was written.

> PS.: Tell me if I'm being boring about intense questioning.
> 
 
Hey, you're welcome to ask.


cheers,
felix



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]