[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:02:01 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Rick R scripsit:
> Something like Stalin, which has reduced need for GC is currently my
> best hope for converting to a ref counting scheme. I'll ask around on
> comp.lang.functional.
There is also Pre-Scheme, which compiles directly to C, imposes four
restrictions (Hindley-Milner static typing, no GC, limited tail-recursion,
and no call/cc). It's used to implement the kernel of Scheme48.
You can grab the paper at http://mumble.net/~kelsey/papers/prescheme.ps.gz .
Download and build Scheme48 from http://scheme48.org and the
Pre-Scheme compiler is available.
--
A: "Spiro conjectures Ex-Lax." John Cowan
Q: "What does Pat Nixon frost her cakes with?" address@hidden
--"Jeopardy" for generative semanticists http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Thomas Chust, 2009/02/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Tobia Conforto, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Rick R, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C,
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Peter Bex, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, John Cowan, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Peter Bex, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, John Cowan, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Peter Bex, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Ivan Raikov, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Rick R, 2009/02/23
- Message not available
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Thomas Chust, 2009/02/24
Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Shawn Rutledge, 2009/02/23