[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Incremental compiling
From: |
William Ramsay |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Incremental compiling |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:49:01 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080914) |
I think I'm getting closer - BUT
When I do this:
Please compile each file with "-unit <unitname>" or use "(declare
(unit <unitname>))"
in the mentioned files. The main program should then use these libraries with
(declare (uses <unitname1> ...))
It again compiles all the units correctly, but global constants are not
recognized.
Would it work if constants were declared in each module (and declared again
when they
are used in different modules)? Likewise, do I need to declare utility modules
for
procedures that are in modA but are called from modB?
This is probably all in a manual somewhere, but reading manuals are for wimps.
Trial
and error has always worked in the past...
Bill