[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] A call to arms
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] A call to arms |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:01:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 01:00:15AM +0000, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote:
> By putting the abstraction layer above the level of "how the structure
> of a result is specified", we can get away with doing all sorts of
> different things.
I really like this idea!
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
experience much like composing poetry or music."
-- Donald Knuth
pgpJltM1D0Tex.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Chicken-users] A call to arms, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] A call to arms, Andrew Gwozdziewycz, 2009/01/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] A call to arms, Peter Bex, 2009/01/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] A call to arms, F. Wittenberger, 2009/01/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] A call to arms, Alaric Snell-Pym, 2009/01/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] A call to arms,
Peter Bex <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] A call to arms, Andrew Gwozdziewycz, 2009/01/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] A call to arms, Alaric Snell-Pym, 2009/01/25
Re: [Chicken-users] A call to arms, david krentzlin, 2009/01/22
Re: [Chicken-users] A call to arms, Felix Lange, 2009/01/21