[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] newbie: foreign pointers that depend on Scheme objec
|
From: |
Alejandro Forero Cuervo |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] newbie: foreign pointers that depend on Scheme objects |
|
Date: |
Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:09:01 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
> I'm not sure I can follow your example completely (I always get
> quickly confused with these scenarios), but I understand the
> "weak"/"finalizable" GC-root suggestion. I have to think more about
> it, but it should be possible.
I think this should be implemented: right now it is *impossible* to
store pointers to Scheme-data inside C-data without the potential for
memory leaks.
Alejo.
http://azul.freaks-unidos.net/
- [Chicken-users] newbie: questions about set-finalizer!, (continued)
- [Chicken-users] newbie: questions about set-finalizer!, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2008/12/15
- Re: [Chicken-users] newbie: questions about set-finalizer!, felix winkelmann, 2008/12/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] newbie: questions about set-finalizer!, felix winkelmann, 2008/12/17
- Re: [Chicken-users] newbie: questions about set-finalizer!, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2008/12/20
- Re: [Chicken-users] newbie: questions about set-finalizer!, felix winkelmann, 2008/12/21
- Re: [Chicken-users] newbie: questions about set-finalizer!, felix winkelmann, 2008/12/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] newbie: questions about set-finalizer!, felix winkelmann, 2008/12/22
Re: [Chicken-users] newbie: foreign pointers that depend on Scheme objects, felix winkelmann, 2008/12/18