Re: [Chicken-users] Possible formating Bug in SRFI-19?

[Kon Lovett]

On Aug 18, 2008, at 8:58 AM, Elf wrote:

> srfi-19 is broken in several ways right now and will be refactored  
> soon.

Please file bug reports.

Also, the SRFI-19 egg uses the numbers extension.

> -elf
>
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
>
> > Hi Kon,
> >
> > I ran into a problem with SRFI-19 formatting.  (Being lazy) I'm not
> > (yet) using the chicken egg, but the version I made up years ago.   
> > Now I
> > found this bug, which - if there are no other tricks in your code -
> > should affect the egg too: in date->string the ~s should hit
<snip>
> > Could you check if this applies to the egg's version?

The reference implementation is unchanged in this instance.

Should be straightforward to modify the srfi-19-io to compensate for  
the trailing '.0', but the various pieces of the 'number->string'  
family, as you imply, might be the better stop.

Please file as a SRFI-19 bug.

> > best regards
> >
> > /Jörg
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Chicken-users mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Best Wishes,
Kon