2008/6/1 Aleksej Saushev <
address@hidden>:
Matthew Welland <address@hidden> writes:
> Has anyone tried using datadraw (http://datadraw.sourceforge.net/) with
> Chicken? If so did any of the claimed performance benefits transfer to
> Chicken code? It almost seems like a scheme compiler or interpreter could
> be built on top of datadraw or coupled extremely close to it rather than
> moving data in and out of it but in any case an interface to chicken seems
> like it'd be really cool.
Any comparison to Berkeley DB? Or is just anouther incarnation of GPL NIH?
> I have some large chunks of data to munge and Chicken + sqlite3 is proving a
> bit slow (8-20 hour run times) and I'm considering rethinking my approach.
There's a trade between speed and persistency, you can't get both.
If you want speed more than persistency, you should just drop the latter,
use main-memory DB or even no DB at all, if you don't need query language
or sharing data between processes.
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users