Re: [chicken-users] silex GPL-2 licensed?

[Leonardo Valeri Manera]

On 21/03/2008, Leonardo Valeri Manera <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 21/03/2008, Tobia Conforto <address@hidden> wrote:
>  >  Seeing as you are in contact with him, and his intentions are pretty
>  >  much a BSD-style license, why don't you ask him for permission to
>  >  stick an actual BSD license on the code, explaining that doing so will
>  >  help people use Silex without any more headaches?
>
>
> A valid point.
>
>  I've just shot off an email, will let you guys know :)
>
>  Leo
>

Well, that was quick, must have caught him in the office.

On 20 Mar 2008 20:40:20 -0400, Danny Dubé <address@hidden> wrote:
> You ask me "Would you mind if...".  I won't risk answering a plain
>  "yes" or "no" as, for the French speaker I am, that expression
>  confuses me.  To make sure, I will answer that it's okay with me if
>  you do what you proposed.
>
>
>  Regards,
>  Danny
>
>  "Leonardo Valeri Manera" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>
> > Me again >_>
>  >
>  > It was pointed out on our mailing list that a BSD (or MIT) license
>  > would be very close to your "do whatever you want with the code"
>  > attitude, but prevent future headaches and make life easier for
>  > distribution packagers who have to specify what license each package
>  > is under.
>  >
>  > Would you mind if we put the silex egg (chicken libs are called eggs)
>  > under a BSD or MIT license, (c) Danny Dubé?
>  >
>  > Sorry to bother you again :)
>  >
>  > Leo

So, yeah, go ahead :)

Leo