Re: [Chicken-users] format-modular feature request: defining one's own multi-part formats

[Robin Lee Powell]

On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 08:48:22AM -0800, Kon Lovett wrote:
>> It seems to me that you could allow limited access to the state
>> object; something like (start-long-fomatter 'name) which would do
>> the sort of state-setup stuff that formatter-cond-start does, and
>> similarily for formatter-cond-next and formatter-cond-end.  But I
>> certainly do not understand the format-modular code, so I could
>> be completely wrong.
>
> Yeah, I didn't understand it at first either.
>
> This will take some time. Are you sure you cannot get most of what
> you want from the existing format?

As I said in another post, I can store the "start" parameters and
then munge the string seperately, so it's not such a big deal.

-Robin

-- 
Lojban Reason #17: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/