[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code
From: |
Leonardo Valeri Manera |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 15:15:27 +0100 |
On 06/03/2008, Alex Shinn <address@hidden> wrote:
> As you said, the semaphore/mutex thread model is broken.
> Computer Science has advanced a lot since then, and there
> are new concurrency models which are just as fast and easier
> to program in. Erlang is well known for its extremely high
> performance, yet this model can be implemented just as
> easily with multi-processes as with multi-threads (in fact,
> since there would be no need to sync the GC or other global
> state it may well be faster as processes). And if
> implemented as processes you can easily extend to multiple
> machines, which is a *much* bigger win.
I don't particularly care whether its lightweight threading - so long
as there is smp support, otherwise I'll take crappy glibc-driven
threads, thnx - or native threading, so long as its full-featured.
Chicken's current thread system works pretty nicely, but its (imo) a
bit short on features compared to other languages.
Leo
- Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code, felix winkelmann, 2008/03/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code, Ivan Raikov, 2008/03/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code, Felix Winkelmann, 2008/03/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code, Ivan Raikov, 2008/03/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code, Houman Zolfaghari, 2008/03/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code, Tobia Conforto, 2008/03/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code, Alaric Snell-Pym, 2008/03/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code,
Leonardo Valeri Manera <=
Re: [Chicken-users] google summer of code, Ivan Raikov, 2008/03/05