Re: [Chicken-users] New immediate values (was: DBI)

[John Cowan]

Alaric Snell-Pym scripsit:

> So do we make the bold move of not defining (token? x)?

No, we realize that just as we need only one empty list (unlike Java, where
any list can have zero elements without losing its identity), we need only
one object that has:

        a unique identity, disjoint from all other objects
        a unique type, disjoint from all other types
        no information inside it

-- 
But you, Wormtongue, you have done what you could for your true master.  Some
reward you have earned at least.  Yet Saruman is apt to overlook his bargains.
I should advise you to go quickly and remind him, lest he forget your faithful
service.  --Gandalf             John Cowan <address@hidden>