[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?
From: |
Kon Lovett |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib? |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:31:34 -0800 |
On Feb 16, 2008, at 6:55 PM, Matt Gushee wrote:
felix winkelmann wrote:
So, it isn't intentionally that way, it's just what the code does.
Thanks for clearing that up.
By the way, I want to say that I really wasn't looking for an
argument. My initial question was a bit abrupt, and I was too quick
to use the word "bug."
Well, Scheme coders can be a little loose w/ the type of return
values. The way Lisps deal w/ truth values causes consternation for
people with a different background.
Scheme was considered by some a step forward because it has a
designated boolean type. But it loosens the definition for truth
testing; a convenience.
This is an area of debate in comp.lang.scheme, but not by me.
I think there's a bit of culture shock going on here, too
-- most of my programming in the last 4 years or so has been in
OCaml. One of the main reasons I became interested in Scheme
(again) was that I came to think that static typing is overrated --
or at least, not as universally useful as its advocates like to
believe.
There is a globally optimizing compiler - Stalin. See the "stalin" egg.
Nonetheless, I've gotten accustomed to a world where datatypes are
used very precisely to model the semantics of your problem domain.
So when I see a function behaving in a way that implies semantics
that aren't in the spec, it just doesn't feel right. Even if I know
it's not really a problem in practice.
Yeah, it isn't right.
Some of the SRFI documents are not up-to-date with respect to the
reference implementation. This isn't true in general & the more
recent are probably in-sync.
--
Matt Gushee
: Bantam - lightweight file manager : matt.gushee.net/software/
bantam/ :
: RASCL's A Simple Configuration Language : matt.gushee.net/
rascl/ :
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Best Wishes,
Kon
- [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?, Matt Gushee, 2008/02/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?, Elf, 2008/02/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?, Matt Gushee, 2008/02/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?, Elf, 2008/02/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?, Matt Gushee, 2008/02/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?, felix winkelmann, 2008/02/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?, Matt Gushee, 2008/02/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?,
Kon Lovett <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?, Jim Ursetto, 2008/02/17
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?, felix winkelmann, 2008/02/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?, Kon Lovett, 2008/02/16