Re: [Chicken-users] Runtime arity?

[Mark Fredrickson]

Thanks for the info, Kon.

I've created a ticket to track this:
http://trac.callcc.org/ticket/417

For now, I'll just special case for my needs.

Cheers,
-M

On Jan 29, 2008 12:52 PM, Kon Lovett <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Jan 29, 2008, at 10:37 AM, John Cowan wrote:
>
> > Graham Fawcett scripsit:
> >
> >> Hm, is it just primitive C functions that need better "procedure
> >> information"? It might be easier to fix that, than to build and
> >> maintain a database.
> >
> > Really only the primitives that are also user-exposed, like +
> > but unlike cons (which is not, technically, a primitive in Chicken).
>
> Yes. By "database" I meant something that maps ##core#primitive
> procedures to "full" lambda info. Don't think it practical to change
> every use of '(##core#primitive "C_foo")' when a central lookup table
> can be built.
>
> >
> > --
> > Samuel Johnson on playing the violin:           John Cowan
> > "Difficult do you call it, Sir?                 address@hidden
> >  I wish it were impossible."                    http://www.ccil.org/
> > ~cowan
>
> Best Wishes,
> Kon
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
>