Re: [Chicken-users] srfi-27 - producing pseudo and truly random numbers over a uniform distribution

[John Cowan]

Terrence Brannon scripsit:

> I dont know why things like SRFI-27 get ratified and have the
> inconsistency that Kon discusses in the "Issues" section of his docs:
> http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/eggs/srfi-27.html

The difference between a final SRFI and a withdrawn SRFI is just
one bit specified entirely by the author of the SRFI.  SRFIs are
not "ratified" in any meaningful sense, though they are discussed.

-- 
John Cowan  address@hidden   http://ccil.org/~cowan
It's the old, old story.  Droid meets droid.  Droid becomes chameleon.
Droid loses chameleon, chameleon becomes blob, droid gets blob back
again.  It's a classic tale.  --Kryten, Red Dwarf