[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] (use foo) versus (declare (uses foo)), csi versus cs
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] (use foo) versus (declare (uses foo)), csi versus csc |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:30:04 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Peter Bex scripsit:
> Why is the difference between compiled and interpreted mode there?
> The meaning of these things isn't fundamentally different between the two
> modes, is it? Can't (declare) statements be parsed by the interpreter as
> well?
They are trivially parsed and ignored with a warning.
--
John Cowan address@hidden http://ccil.org/~cowan
I must confess that I have very little notion of what [s. 4 of the British
Trade Marks Act, 1938] is intended to convey, and particularly the sentence
of 253 words, as I make them, which constitutes sub-section 1. I doubt if
the entire statute book could be successfully searched for a sentence of
equal length which is of more fuliginous obscurity. --MacKinnon LJ, 1940