[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-users] Issues with the blas library
From: |
Ivan Raikov |
Subject: |
[Chicken-users] Issues with the blas library |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Jul 2007 13:09:55 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (gnu/linux) |
Hi all,
I accidentally discovered that the procedure blas:dgemm in the blas
egg causes a segmentation fault when called with a TRANSPOSE argument
that is a character, instead of one of the transpose constants. Is
this normal, or could it possibly be an indication of an issue with
the FFI interface?
Also, would anyone be opposed if I modify the blas interface to
have safe/unsafe and pure/destructive variants of each routine,
similar to the interface of the atlas-lapack egg? I think it's
sensible to at least add optional bounds checking, which simplifies
debugging considerably, and a pure functional interface makes it a lot
less awkward to program with blas.
-Ivan
- [Chicken-users] Issues with the blas library,
Ivan Raikov <=