Re: [Chicken-users] chicken and stalin

[foobar]

felix winkelmann schrieb:
> On 6/5/07, John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Brandon Van Every scripsit:
>> > Speed, to the exclusion of all other considerations, is not the real
>> > world.  I can understand compiling portable Scheme code under any 2
>> > different compilers.  I cannot fathom trying to get such code to
>> > interoperate.  This thread reads like a Frankenstein support
>> > nightmare.
>>
>> Developing code under Chicken is fairly straightforward; developing
>> code under Stalin is painful in the extreme.  It therefore is plausible
>> to have a Stalin-compatible library for Chicken that allows one to
>> develop code that Stalin can handle after it is fully debugged under
>> Chicken.  You can then gain the advantages of Stalin's massive
>> optimizations to gain execution speed.
>>
>
> BTW, has anyone gotten stalin to work lately? I ran my 512mb Athlon
> for the whole night and was not able to compile stalin 0.11 (gcc 4.1.2).
I didn't compile it myself, but it is in the universe repos of feisty fawn.
It's version 0.11-1 so basically yes, i am able to work with it.


Greets David