[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] 32 bit integers?
From: |
Dan Muresan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] 32 bit integers? |
Date: |
Wed, 23 May 2007 00:15:06 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306) |
The bitwise-* procedures & arithmetic-shift are supposed to work w/
fixnums & integer flonums. The magnitude of a flonum is converted to a C
unsigned int (on 32 bit machines, u_int64_t otherwise), operated upon,
then the result is returned as a fixnum or flonum, depending on the
precision of the operation result.
Hm, what's an "integer flonum"? A 32 bit signed-int converted to a float?
Anyways, how is it supposed to work?
csi> (require-extension (srfi 60))
csi> (bitwise-ior 4.0 1)
Error: (vector-ref) bad argument type: 11.0
This is with chicken 2.6, before (req-ext numbers)
The modulo-2^32 is a problem though.
Yeah... You really have to keep it all in C; as soon as you go through
Chicken, you lose precision.
Best,
Dan
- [Chicken-users] 32 bit integers?, Dan Muresan, 2007/05/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] 32 bit integers?, Kon Lovett, 2007/05/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] 32 bit integers?, Dan Muresan, 2007/05/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] 32 bit integers?, Kon Lovett, 2007/05/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] 32 bit integers?, Kon Lovett, 2007/05/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] 32 bit integers?,
Dan Muresan <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] 32 bit integers?, John Cowan, 2007/05/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] 32 bit integers?, Kon Lovett, 2007/05/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] 32 bit integers?, Dan Muresan, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: [Chicken-users] 32 bit integers?, Kon Lovett, 2007/05/23