|
From: | bryan rasmussen |
Subject: | Re: [Chicken-users] build irritations on windows xp |
Date: | Mon, 30 Apr 2007 23:30:44 +0200 |
okay well, I started building with msys, had some problems with CMAKE at first, when building got to the following part: Linking C static library libchicken-boot.a [ 62%] Built target libchicken-boot Scanning dependencies of target libpcre-for-static [ 66%] Building C object pcre/CMakeFiles/libpcre-for-static.dir/chartables.obj [ 66%] Building C object pcre/CMakeFiles/libpcre-for-static.dir/pcre_compile.obj c:/programminglanguages/scheme/chicken-2.6/pcre/pcre_compile.c: In function `compile_branch': c:/programminglanguages/scheme/chicken-2.6/pcre/pcre_compile.c:3263: `MAX_DUPLENGTH' undeclared (first use in this function) c:/programminglanguages/scheme/chicken-2.6/pcre/pcre_compile.c:3263: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once c:/programminglanguages/scheme/chicken-2.6/pcre/pcre_compile.c:3263: for each function it appears in.) c:/programminglanguages/scheme/chicken-2.6/pcre/pcre_compile.c:3869: `MAX_NAME_COUNT' undeclared (first use in this function) c:/programminglanguages/scheme/chicken-2.6/pcre/pcre_compile.c:3877: `MAX_NAME_SIZE' undeclared (first use in this function) make[2]: *** [pcre/CMakeFiles/libpcre-for-static.dir/pcre_compile.obj] Error 1 make[1]: *** [pcre/CMakeFiles/libpcre-for-static.dir/all] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 Any explanation? Wrong PCRE? Cheers, Bryan Rasmussen On 4/24/07, felix winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
On 4/22/07, bryan rasmussen <address@hidden> wrote: > Hey, > > I recently had to do some cleaning on my system, I am sitting here > with some time for some programming and trying to get Chicken running > again. Not going good for recompiling. Get half of the way in any > compile but get thrown by PCRE, this is the case using MSys, MingGW, > and Open Watcom. From OpenWatcom the error report starts with: > >[...] > > any help on these? > Sergey Khorev started trying to get chicken with Open Watcom to work, but it turned out to be pretty hard. We had some issues fixed, but there still were loads of problems with dynamic linking (IIRC). So consider Open Watcom currently unsupported. > by the way, didn't there used to be a Windows binary on the front page > of the Chicken Scheme site? > Yes, but we removed it - since the installation path is compiled into the executables, one has to build chicken from source. cheers, felix
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |