|
From: | minh thu |
Subject: | Re : [Chicken-users] opengl egg naming scheme |
Date: | Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:58:53 +0100 |
2007/2/27, Kon Lovett <address@hidden>:
On Feb 27, 2007, at 10:53 AM, minh thu wrote: > Hi, > > At the beginning of my journey with Chicken, I stolen the opengl egg > and repacked it: I changed its naming gl:UpperCase in glAsInC. > > Now I have code I'd like to share that depends on the glAsInC naming. > It would not be very difficult for me to change it but I find it ugly. > > Is there any rationale to keep/change the extant egg ? To provide a > new one ? > > Or is it possible to use the extant egg (the one with gl:Naming) but > use it as if it was named glLikeThis ? (define glAsInC gl:UpperCase)
Ouch, that's a lot of defines :) Thanks thu
Felix's naming for the glut & opengl eggs is a little odd in that he follows the C binding CamlCase style - not the Scheme way, especially since Scheme, up thru R5RS, is case-insensitive. (See http://community.schemewiki.org/?variable-naming-convention) Best Wishes, Kon > > Thanks, > thu > > > _______________________________________________ > Chicken-users mailing list > address@hidden > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |