Re: [Chicken-users] url egg

[Daishi Kato]

Hi,

I'm not sure if I understand your suggestion all.
Are you saying that the url egg should contain url.scm and uri.scm and
you would clean up uri.scm?
I'm totally lost about the urc: prefix issue.

Daishi

On 2/22/07, Kon Lovett <address@hidden> wrote:
> Just url is fine. I would remove the html: stuff altogether from the
> SLIB derived code & place the ftp: stuff (only 1 proc I think) into
> its' own file. So only url related code is in url. Should also decide
> on namespace style. I kept the urc:/uri: prefixs & added '-' versions
> of the symbols. (It was to be a port of SLIB code.) But we only need
> one style, I suggest the '-' style.