[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] environments egg
From: |
Arto Bendiken |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] environments egg |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:58:03 +0100 |
On 2/9/07, Daishi Kato <address@hidden> wrote:
I see. I understand that the structure doesn't have a parent pointer,
but I'm not sure if this feature can be wrapped on top of the current things.
I simply meant that you can use (define-record) to wrap your own
structure around the environment structure, and include a parent
pointer (and any other needed goodies) in that.
(I take "easily" as the possibility of coding in an interpreter only
with standard procedures.)
Well, I'm building an interpreter with first-class macros and
namespaces, so hopefully the structure is flexible enough :-)
--
Arto Bendiken | address@hidden | http://bendiken.net/
- [Chicken-users] environments egg, Daishi Kato, 2007/02/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] environments egg, Arto Bendiken, 2007/02/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] environments egg, felix winkelmann, 2007/02/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] environments egg, Daishi Kato, 2007/02/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] environments egg, Daishi Kato, 2007/02/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] environments egg,
Arto Bendiken <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] environments egg, Daishi Kato, 2007/02/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] environments egg, Arto Bendiken, 2007/02/13
- Re: [Chicken-users] environments egg, Daishi Kato, 2007/02/13
- Re: [Chicken-users] environments egg, Arto Bendiken, 2007/02/14