Re: Re : [Chicken-users] thread-sleep! for less than a second

[Daishi Kato]

On 1/16/07, felix winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 1/16/07, Daishi Kato <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > BTW, timeout is also used for thread-join!, mutex-lock! and
> > mutex-unlock! in srfi-18.
> > It'd be more consistent to have */ms procedures for these above.
> > Or, since timeout for these procedures including thread-sleep! can be
> > a time object,
> > introducing time->milliseconds and milliseconds->time would be sufficient.
> >
>
> I prefer the latter solution. Could you write a ticket at
> http://trac.callcc.org for
> this?

Sure, and done.
With the latter solution, we don't need thread-sleep!/ms, right?

--daishi