On 12/18/06, felix winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 12/15/06, Daishi Kato <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > Sure.
> > Are you going to add unread-string in port class? Or exposing the buffer?
> >
>
> No, but I've pushed a few changes to the darcs head that add special
> handling of read-line for tcp and string ports. No big improvement, here,
> though. Please have a look.
So, you added read-line to the port class.
> > The performance is improved just a little bit, but better than nothing.
> > The arguments are always ports, and code for Gambit has the same syntax.
> > And,I got no error with my simple xml-rpc test.
> > I can commit the patch if you or anyone responsible wants.
>
> Yes, please commit it.
Did it.