Re: [Chicken-users] stack traces

[felix winkelmann]

On 11/21/06, Dan <address@hidden> wrote:
> > But I simply don't grok psyntax well enough to
> > integrate it's
>
> Ah, sorry about bugging you then, this must have been
> on the list before... At the same time, I think what
> you wrote is more of a statement about the overly
> complex psyntax implementation than about any
> particular Scheme implementor :)

Well, psyntax is good, don't get me wrong. It's a feast
of Scheme programming and packs incredible power
in relatively few lines of code. But it does a complex job,
and thus it is complex code.


cheers,
felix


--
http://galinha.ucpel.tche.br:8081/blog/blog.ssp