[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken + current darcs HEAD = borked
From: |
Adam C. Emerson |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken + current darcs HEAD = borked |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:59:38 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
In order to get the eggs to compile cleanly on my system:
In the openssl egg:
--- openssl.scm.old 2006-08-21 13:54:20.893334192 -0400
+++ openssl.scm 2006-08-21 13:54:31.042791240 -0400
@@ -50,11 +50,7 @@
#include <openssl/ssl.h>
<#
-#>:
-ERR_load_crypto_strings();
-SSL_load_error_strings();
-SSL_library_init();
-
+#>
#ifdef _WIN32
RAND_screen();
#endif
(Those three function prototypes clashed with the definitions in the
OpenSSL include file.)
In the numbers egg:
--- numbers-base.scm.old 2006-08-21 13:56:47.323073488 -0400
+++ numbers-base.scm 2006-08-21 13:56:59.233262864 -0400
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
; Germany
-#>!
+#>
#include "numbers-c.h"
<#
And in the s11n egg:
--- s11n.scm.old 2006-08-21 13:58:04.461346688 -0400
+++ s11n.scm 2006-08-21 13:58:12.719091320 -0400
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
<#
-#>!
+#>
static char *procedure_to_id(___scheme_value p)
{
return C_lookup_procedure_id((void *)C_block_item(p, 0));
Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken + current darcs HEAD = borked, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/08/21
Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken + current darcs HEAD = borked, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/08/21
Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken + current darcs HEAD = borked, felix winkelmann, 2006/08/23