|
| From: | Daishi Kato |
| Subject: | Re: [Chicken-users] s11n among different chicken versions |
| Date: | Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:32:55 +0900 |
Looks like the s11n egg is updated. So I tried, only to see I'm
missing something.
Here is my fallback func:
(define (deserialize-fallback id)
(cond ((string=? id "f_3497library.scm") ; chicken-2.315
equal?)
((string=? id "f_6914extras.scm") ; chicken-2.315
hash)
(else
(error "deserialize-fallback unknown id" id))))
What is missing?
Daishi
On 7/21/06, felix winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
On 7/21/06, Daishi Kato <address@hidden> wrote: > > Does SRFI-10 keep identity? > In other words, how can it handle this: (let ([x (cons 1 1)]) (cons x x)) No, it's just a means of extending the reader. > > OK, it seems s11n is easier for my purpose. > Although I still do not understand the internals of s11n, > my proposal is to allow deserialize to have an optional > fallback deserializer, just like serialize has an optional > fallbak serializer; why not? Good point. I'll take a look. cheers, felix -- http://galinha.ucpel.tche.br:8081/blog/blog.ssp
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |