Re: [Chicken-users] Handling unstandard reader macros.

[Pupeno]

On Monday 21 November 2005 01:59, felix winkelmann wrote:
> On 11/19/05, Pupeno <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 November 2005 14:23, felix winkelmann wrote:
> > > You will have to add reader-procedures (via set-read-synrax!
> > > or set-dispatch-read-syntax!) for the missing macros yourself
> > > and skip the contents.
> >
> > After reading about it, it seem I'll had to implement about 16 cases of
> > different string processing procedures, not nice indeed, any better
> > solution ?
>
> You only need to handle compiler-specifiic syntax, which is mainly
> #> ... <#-
Why ? I already handle that and I already encountered cases where I'd have to 
handle <<EOF and similar.

BTW, what should I return from my procedures that handle extensions. I was 
returning '() but that causes an error, I am now returning '(nevermind) since 
I don't care about it.

Thank you.
-- 
Pupeno <address@hidden> (http://pupeno.com)

pgpdD_Bzzjq8L.pgp
Description: PGP signature