Re: [Chicken-users] A few questions...

[Benedikt Rosenau]

On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 08:53:37AM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:

> Q3: What are you missing most desperately from Chicken, or better:
>   if there is one thing that you really want it to have, what would that be?

I would like have an arity-function, i.e.:

(define (bla fasel) ...)
(arity bla) = > 1

It should also give the arity in cases like:
(define (blubb . fasel) ...)

Maybe one can encode the arity as a negative number in these cases.
After all, Chicken knows the negative zero now...
   Benedikt