Re: [Chicken-users] Some notes on simple-macros extension

[felix winkelmann]

Thanks, I will apply the fixes ASAP.


cheers,
felix


On 8/3/05, Dale Jordan <address@hidden> wrote:
> I have found a couple of problems with the simple-macros extension:
> 
> - The definitions of "include" and "define-macro" in
> chicken-macros-module.scm need to have their argument changed from
> "form" to "(form)" in line with the change referred to on the srfi-72
> discussion list.
> 
> - I found it useful to add "##sys#setslot" to the chicken-internals
> module export list defined in simple-macros.scm.
> 
> Michele Simionato reports:
>  > ,x does not work in the REPL;
> 
> I haven't seen this and have it used it extensively.  (I have the debug
> extension loaded.  I recompiled it for 2.0, but I don't know if this is
> related.)
> 
> There are a few things with this macro system I don't yet understand,
> but I have to say that it makes writing macros fun again!  I really like
> it.  Thanks, felix for putting it up so quickly.
> 
> Cheerfully.
> Dale
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
>