[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Chicken-users] new eggs and egg-fixes
From: |
Jonah Beckford |
Subject: |
RE: [Chicken-users] new eggs and egg-fixes |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:44:02 -0400 |
Figured it out; the user can't define macros; fuel seems to change meaning
(so probably tied to garbage collection) every execution. Cool. Thanks.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf
> Of Jonah Beckford
> Sent: July 19, 2004 7:19 PM
> To: 'felix'; 'chicken-users'
> Subject: RE: [Chicken-users] new eggs and egg-fixes
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > Subject: [Chicken-users] new eggs and egg-fixes
> >
> > ...
> >
> > - sandbox: safe evaluation-environment for Scheme code
>
> That's an extremely useful egg; gave it a whirl. When you say "Macros are
> not supported" in the egg documentation, and there exists a
> (safe-environment-macro-set!) function, what do you mean? Also, is "fuel"
> the allowed stack-depth / number-of-continuations?
>
> Thanks, Jonah
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users