[Chicken-users] bug(?) in macroexpansion

[Panagiotis Vossos]

I am using chicken 1.0 and I think there is a bug in the way macros
are expanded when hygenic macros are in use.  I don't have chicken
running on this machine right now, but I remember that if you define a
macro like:

(define-syntax foo
  (syntax-rules ()
    ((_ x) (+ "baz" x))))

, then (foo 10) gets expanded as:

(+ '"baz" '10)

when it should be:

(+ "baz" 10).

I came across this when trying to compile library.scm with -hygienic
and it complained about incorrect use of inline_allocate or something.

Am I missing something or is it indeed a bug?

cheers,
panagiotis.