RE: [Chicken-users] Patch for tagged pointers

[Jonah Beckford]

Agreed.

Thanks, Jonah

-----Original Message-----
From: Felix Winkelmann [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: February 13, 2003 4:57 AM
To: Jonah Beckford
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Patch for tagged pointers


Jonah Beckford wrote:
> The new C_TAGGED_POINTER_TYPE does not have a representation as a 
> TinyCLOS metaobject.  Thanks Felix for adding that into CVS.
> 

Right. Forgot about that. Many thanks for the patch.

Perhaps we should make <tagged-pointer> be a subclass of <pointer>? The
following will do that:

(define <tagged-pointer> (make-primitive-class "tagged-pointer"
<pointer>)))


cheers,
felix