[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-janitors] #1020: matchable: Add conversion pattern(s)
From: |
Chicken Trac |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-janitors] #1020: matchable: Add conversion pattern(s) |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:20:38 -0000 |
#1020: matchable: Add conversion pattern(s)
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: syn | Owner: ashinn
Type: enhancement | Status: accepted
Priority: not urgent at all | Milestone: someday
Component: extensions | Version: 4.8.x
Resolution: | Keywords: matchable
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Comment(by syn):
Ah, you are right, = is almost the same, except that it only allows for
exactly one following pattern. I didn't notice it because the
documentation is a bit misleading (suggesting that it only works on
fields, although this is only one common case). Maybe I can think of
something to improve that. Should you consider adding a shortcut, perhaps
=? would be a good name. How about extending = to allow for more than one
following pattern in any case? This would even be backwards compatible.
--
Ticket URL: <http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/1020#comment:4>
Chicken Scheme <http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/>
Chicken Scheme is a compiler for the Scheme programming language.
- [Chicken-janitors] #1020: matchable: Add conversion pattern(s), Chicken Trac, 2013/07/12
- Re: [Chicken-janitors] #1020: matchable: Add conversion pattern(s), Chicken Trac, 2013/07/12
- Re: [Chicken-janitors] #1020: matchable: Add conversion pattern(s), Chicken Trac, 2013/07/12
- Re: [Chicken-janitors] #1020: matchable: Add conversion pattern(s), Chicken Trac, 2013/07/12
- Re: [Chicken-janitors] #1020: matchable: Add conversion pattern(s),
Chicken Trac <=
- Re: [Chicken-janitors] #1020: matchable: Add conversion pattern(s), Chicken Trac, 2013/07/12
- Re: [Chicken-janitors] #1020: matchable: Add conversion pattern(s), Chicken Trac, 2013/07/13