[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules
From: |
Chicken Trac |
Subject: |
[Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:15:43 -0000 |
#445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mario | Owner: felix
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: 4.7.0
Component: expander | Version: 4.6.x
Resolution: | Keywords:
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Changes (by felix):
* component: unknown => expander
Comment:
Replying to [comment:6 sjamaan]:
>
> I fixed this by looking up the value in the current syntax env and if
it's a macro comparing its handler to all handlers in the core syntax env.
If the handler is found, use the name that handler is bound to in the core
syntax env.
>
> If the name is not found in the current syntax env, the name is just
returned as that name would be looked up in the core syntax env by the
macro expander, so it's either already the core name, or simply not a
macro at all.
>
I think it would be a bit simpler to just remember the SE-entries
generated in the initial macro-env (I changed `##sys#extend-macro-
environment` recently to return the entry) and directly compare the
resolved name with the entry. What do you think?
--
Ticket URL: <http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/445#comment:7>
Chicken Scheme <http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/>
Chicken Scheme is a compiler for the Scheme programming language.
- [Chicken-janitors] #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules, Chicken Trac, 2010/12/09
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules, Chicken Trac, 2010/12/09
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules, Chicken Trac, 2010/12/10
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules, Chicken Trac, 2010/12/10
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules, Chicken Trac, 2010/12/11
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules, Chicken Trac, 2010/12/11
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules, Chicken Trac, 2010/12/12
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules,
Chicken Trac <=
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules, Chicken Trac, 2010/12/16
- [Chicken-janitors] Re: #445: define-record doesn't respect scope rules, Chicken Trac, 2010/12/20