Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix r4rs, , r4rs-null and r5rs-null modules

[Peter Bex]

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 04:29:55PM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote:
> However, I *do* think their bindings should be equivalent to those
> provided by (null-environment 4) and (null-environment 5). What makes
> you think they're different?

Never mind, I didn't read the standard correctly.  They're fine.
Let's keep them, it seems to make sense to have them as modules
if they also are available as first-class environments.

Cheers,
Peter

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature