[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] Add missing syntax checks

From: Peter Bex
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH][5] Add missing syntax checks
Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 13:02:30 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:04:05PM +0200, lemonboy wrote:
> Hello hackers,
> this patch does what it says on the tin and can be safely applied to
> the 4 branch,
> I didn't supply a separate patch in the hope the patch(1) deity
> manages me to spare
> this effort :)

Good catch, however the syntax check for define-foreign-type is too
strict: it should accept anything that evaluates to a procedure,
not just a symbol that refers to one.  The attached patch fixes


Attachment: 0001-Check-the-syntax-correctness-for-some-constructs.patch
Description: Text Data

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]