[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling
From: |
felix . winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:29:56 +0100 |
> I've done some tests and I was able to get strange behaviour from the
> scheduler, see
> http://paste.call-cc.org/paste?id=d9e4c5b8f8473fd1114dcec56c9c8a079b252362
> However, none of these behaved any different under CHICKEN 4.9.0.1
> or 4.10.0, so it's not strictly speaking a regression that MUST be fixed
> before 4.11.
Does it have to be fixed in Chicken 4 at all? I think every effort should put
into getting
Chicken 5 ready. The current pace is insane and will not be sustainable
forever. Let's
get 4.11 out and then turn to new things.
felix
- [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/19
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/19
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/21
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/21
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling,
felix . winkelmann <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, felix . winkelmann, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Evan Hanson, 2016/02/24
- [Chicken-hackers] force-primordial: proposal of a compromise solution - was Re: slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/24