[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [Scheme-reports] R7RS-small draft ratified by Stee
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [Scheme-reports] R7RS-small draft ratified by Steering Committee
Sat, 12 Jul 2014 13:41:38 -0400
Alex Shinn scripsit:
> That's still a lot more than provide 1+ out of the box (do any other
> than Guile?).
Provide `1+` but not `add1`: MIT, Guile, SCM, XLisp, Rep, Elk, FemtoLisp,
Provide `add1` but not `1+`: Racket, Chicken, SISC, Vicare, IronScheme,
Provide both: Chez, Sizzle.
So as far as counting Schemes go, it's a wash; but since almost the
beginning of this process I have adopted the rule "witnesses should be
weighed, not counted."
> > See <http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/PlusOneEx> for details.
> You tested the wrong thing - the original question was about
> 1+, then 1+x was brought up, not +1x.
I actually tested the right thing, but reported it wrongly. (Post in
haste, repent at leisure.) In any case, the tests for 1+ are now merged
in and some errors corrected. We are stuck with the wrong page name,
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan address@hidden
But the next day there came no dawn, and the Grey Company passed on
into the darkness of the Storm of Mordor and were lost to mortal sight;
but the Dead followed them. --"The Passing of the Grey Company"
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [Scheme-reports] R7RS-small draft ratified by Steering Committee, John Boyle, 2014/07/11
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [Chicken-users] R7RS-small draft ratified by Steering Committee, Peter Bex, 2014/07/12