[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1133

From: Evan Hanson
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1133
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:49:01 -0700
User-agent: OpenSMTPD enqueuer (Demoosh)

On 2014-06-26 16:29, Peter Bex wrote:
> > BTW, what's the status of that egg? The last time I looked it seemed
> > to be basically complete. Or is there still anything missing? (I know
> > there are some rough edges, and obscure warnings, but does it
> > basically work?)
> I've asked Seth and he said it's working adequately.  Maybe Evan can
> provide us with some more in-depth info.

There's not much that's obviously missing anymore, it's mostly rough
edges as you said. The list at
is up to date.

Actually, the most important todo is probably documentation of the
gotchas/limitations/interplay between the egg and core that aren't
obvious from that list, e.g. `(import (foo bar))` doesn't load code
from ./foo/bar.scm (or ".sld" as seems to have become common), one must
`(import-for-syntax (r7rs))` to get R7RS's syntax-rules, and so on. But,
overall, I'd be fine with releasing it with such disclaimers just so
people can start hacking at it.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]