[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Small improvement in Make's handling of va
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Small improvement in Make's handling of variables, and a question about other common variables
Wed, 18 Jun 2014 01:20:41 +0400
Gnus/5.1299999999999999 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix)
Peter Bex <address@hidden> writes:
> As I noticed in the pkgsrc script for building CHICKEN, we're being
> somewhat inconsistent and incompatible with common UNIX practice in
> our handling of user-settable variables in the Makefiles.
> Some like PREFIX, DESTDIR and PLATFORM but also C_COMPILER etc, can be
> provided from the environment. When Make encounters an undefined
> variable or a variable assignment using the "?=" operator, this Make
> variable will get the value from the corresponding environment variable.
> This is highly undesirable for "internal" variables, but for those
> which are user-settable like the ones I mentioned and various directory
> prefixes, that's a Good Thing, as you can set environment variables in
> your shell startup file and all Makefiles will pick up on them. There
> are some typical conventions on what variables will be accepted (but
> those don't seem to be formally standardized anywhere I can see, except
> for http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/make.html;
> more on that later).
> Anyway, long story short, I think it's a good idea to stick closer
> to commonly found conventions and to allow all the configurable
> directory prefixes to be copied from the environment.
> This patch does that, but it also changes the meaning of two variables:
> INCDIR points to the chicken-specific directory, which is kind of
> dangerous if there's another program which also uses this variable
> name to indicate the toplevel include dir. *usually* this is called
> INCLUDEDIR, though, so I've decided to introduce this option and rename
> INCDIR to CHICKENINCDIR "just in case". You'll notice that this nicely
> matches the CHICKENLIBDIR which was already there. It's also clearer,
> as you would expect INCDIR and LIBDIR to be at the same "level", but
> it *will* break the install for everyone who was overriding INCDIR.
> Luckily, INCDIR isn't documented ;)
I couldn't find evidence for "usually INCLUDEDIR". NetBSD calls it "INCSDIR",
FreeBSD calls it "INCLUDEDIR", OpenBSD doesn't bother calling it, they use
"/usr/include" inline, autoconf calls it "includedir".
> Finally, regarding the Make page in the Single Unix Spec; that mentions
> tool names like CC, LD and options like CFLAGS. It might be worthwhile
> trying to switch to those conventions, but for two things:
> - It would probably break a lot more usages than the MANDIR and INCDIR
> changes, because people will be using specific C compilers more
> often (even if it's just a different version of their compiler).
> Linkers and assemblers less so, probably, but it may be done.
> - I'm unsure how cross-compilation is usually handled. There's only
> one "CC" AFAIK, but CHICKEN needs (at most) three, in order to
> distinguish between compiling this machine versus on the host
> (when cross-compiling CHICKEN itself to another "host" platform)
> the target machine (compiling with CHICKEN on the host machine to
> another machine to run the final program on).
CC points to the compiler. When cross-compiling it is cross-compiler.
In this case CFLAGS holds flags for this cross-compiler.
If, for some reason, you need other additional tools, you add them.
E.g. HOST_CC, HOST_CXX, HOST_LD, whatever (with variables to pass flags
like HOST_CFLAGS, HOST_LDFLAGS and so on).
> This will allow us to gradually phase out C_COMPILER; we obsolete it
> first, then after 4.10.0, maybe change $(warning) to $(error) and
> finally remove it in 4.11.0. This means it won't immediately break
> existing scripts or configs which override C_COMPILER.
> Thoughts? Ideas?
I like it.
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Small improvement in Make's handling of variables, and a question about other common variables, Felix Winkelmann, 2014/06/13
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Small improvement in Make's handling of variables, and a question about other common variables, Peter Bex, 2014/06/13
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Small improvement in Make's handling of variables, and a question about other common variables,
Aleksej Saushev <=
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Small improvement in Make's handling of variables, and a question about other common variables, Christian Kellermann, 2014/06/19