[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Replace unsafe string functions with their
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Replace unsafe string functions with their safer counterparts |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Feb 2014 19:24:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 11:05:48AM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Peter Bex scripsit:
>
> > Yes, that's fine. I'm tired of arguing about this, and I know I can't
> > win. I prefer getting the patch in over arguing about it, and nobody
> > else seems to have an opinion about this.
>
> I do, actually.
Sorry, too late.
> The trouble with this code is that it copies a byte
> at a time, and so may be much less efficient than existing library
> versions
What, like the original code from OpenBSD libc that Christian posted,
and which also works a byte at a time?
> which do it smart, a 32-bit or 64-bit word at a time with
> adjustments. I would like to see some measurements on at least
> a few platforms before we install this vanilla code.
Patches are welcome.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Replace unsafe string functions with their safer counterparts, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2014/02/05
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Replace unsafe string functions with their safer counterparts, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2014/02/05
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Replace unsafe string functions with their safer counterparts, Peter Bex, 2014/02/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Replace unsafe string functions with their safer counterparts, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2014/02/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Replace unsafe string functions with their safer counterparts, Peter Bex, 2014/02/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Replace unsafe string functions with their safer counterparts, Peter Bex, 2014/02/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Replace unsafe string functions with their safer counterparts, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2014/02/07