[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATH] fix for srfi-13 string-trim-right start par
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATH] fix for srfi-13 string-trim-right start parameter |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Jan 2014 13:28:12 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
.alyn.post. scripsit:
> Did you review the, uh "rest" of sfri-13 to see if this pattern is
> repeated elsewhere? I'd suspect the implementor, making this
> mistake, would make it in multiple places.
It's definitely not a problem in string-trim or string-trim-both:
#;2> (string-trim "x abc" char-whitespace? 1)
"abc"
#;3> (string-trim-both "x abc " char-whitespace? 1)
"abc"
The bug fix given in
<http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-13/post-mail-archive/msg00007.html>
should also be applied, as it is still present in the Chicken version.
Someone should also verify that Chicken's definition
of `let-optionals*` is the correct one for SRFI 13; see
<http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-13/post-mail-archive/msg00008.html>,
<http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-13/post-mail-archive/msg00009.html>,
and <http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-13/post-mail-archive/msg00010.html>
for discussion.
--
Unless it was by accident that I had John Cowan
offended someone, I never apologized. address@hidden
--Quentin Crisp http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATH] fix for srfi-13 string-trim-right start parameter, .alyn.post., 2014/01/11
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATH] fix for srfi-13 string-trim-right start parameter, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2014/01/11
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATH] fix for srfi-13 string-trim-right start parameter, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2014/01/19