Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #944

[Peter Bex]

On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 09:05:14AM +0100, Peter Bex wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Here's the patch I attached to #944.  I think we all agree that Chicken
> with this patch behaves better than without.  Even if it isn't fully
> hygienic at least it doesn't fail to compile Andy's example program.

Sorry for downloading the HTML version.  I should've checked....

Here's the proper version (thanks, Christian, for pointing this out!)

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth

0001-Fix-944-by-making-the-behvior-of-macro-renamed-defin.patch
Description: Text document