chicken-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?]


From: Felix
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?]
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:14:42 +0200 (CEST)

From: Mario Domenech Goulart <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?]
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:46:37 -0400

> On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 00:03:40 -0400 John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> Mario Domenech Goulart scripsit:
>>
>>>  # for cygwin
>>> -test -f ../cygchicken-0.dll && cp ../cygchicken-0.dll .
>>> +if test -f ../cygchicken-0.dll; then
>>> +    cp ../cygchicken-0.dll .
>>> +    cp ../cygchicken-0.dll reverser/tags/1.0
>>> +fi
>>> +mv ../cygchicken-0.dll ../cygchicken-0.dll_
>>
>> All these copies and moves, including the last, need to be inside the
>> scope of the "if test -f", or it's not idempotent.
> 
> Indeed, John.  Thanks for noticing that.  Attached is an updated version
> of the patch.
> 
> I tested it on master, and I could "make ... spotless install check"
> successfully.

Does that mean the deployment test succeeded?


cheers,
felix



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]