[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] string->number shouldn't raise errors but
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] string->number shouldn't raise errors but return #f on failure
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:22:31 +0100
I have pushed your patch and dropped the C_i_ prefix from the
internal helper procedure as discussed on #chicken.
> PS: shouldn't C_i_finitep actually be called C_u_i_finitep?
> It's obviously unsafe (pass it any non-fixnum immediate and it'll
> probably blow up).
I think so too, this definitely belongs to another patch. Other
9 out of 10 voices in my head say, that I am crazy,
one is humming.