[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Darcs' experiences with the software freedom conse

From: Mario Domenech Goulart
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] Darcs' experiences with the software freedom conservancy
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:57:29 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux)


On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:07:12 -0400 (EDT) Felix <address@hidden> wrote:

> From: Christian Kellermann <address@hidden>
> Subject: [Chicken-hackers] Darcs' experiences with the software freedom 
> conservancy
> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:09:03 +0200
>> as part of my homework I have asked Eric Kow, member of the darcs
>> project for his advice and experience with the Software Freedom
>> Conservancy. Please find his excellent answers below. Thanks Eric!
> Excellent, Christian. That is certainly very helpful. In case this
> hasn't been leaked through (I mentioned it on #chicken yesterday), I
> have contacted a member of the Samba team who has been very helpful
> and who forwarded my question (similar to yours) to other Samba
> folks. Since he mentioned that responses from the SFC may take a
> while, let's wait until we know more.

I just noticed OpenEmbedded uses services from a German legal entity.
Maybe it's a good alternative for Chicken. 

,----[ ]
| The current organization for OE is a German eV legal entity (similar to
| KDE: and is for the purpose of managing finances,
| voting, and membership.
| An 'eV' for 'eingetragener Verein', in the German law, translates to a
| voluntary organization; a group of individuals who voluntarily enter
| into an agreement to form a body (or organization) to accomplish a
| purpose. The organization has members. 

Best wishes.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]